Al -Khatib: To dialogue with the interest of Lebanon

Sheikh Al -Khatib considered that “this culture that some media carries and publishes in Lebanon is behind the enemy.”

The words of the scholar Al -Khatib came during the memorial ceremony of the father of the former deputy, Amin Wehbe in Hosseini, the town of Labaya, in the presence of a group of scholars, political, partisan, social, municipal and optional activities and a crowd of the town and the region.

On the issue of the resistance weapon, Sheikh Al -Khatib said: “With all love, we say to the loyalists and the opponents of the resistance weapon, that matters are not taken in this way, through the media and ridicule and through this simplicity in these matters, the Israeli enemy is still bombing and killing and did not abide by an international decision or otherwise, and unfortunately some internal forces try to give justifications to the Israeli enemy in the continuation of his war, and strikes the wall. And the people of the martyrs, our villages and our cities that the enemy destroyed, there is no moral observance, and this is not patriotic, so national issues are not dealt with among those who believe that they are the sons of one country, and it is assumed that during the dangers and when the country faces a war, all its sons will fall into solidarity and that they stand together in the face of dangers and confront enemies.

The scholar Al -Khatib considered that “those who demand the disarmament of the resistance, they go beyond President Joseph Aoun, who drew a path to the solution, so that they want to impose on the President of the Republic what they want, they want the president of a republic to implement their policy and ends and want a government that achieves their goals and interests, you are not alone in the country, and we salute the President of the Republic who acts wisely and objectively and does not want the country to take the country And to the division, and he wants to bring together the Lebanese, so that we all stand behind the President of the Republic and behind the state, and you were talking about sovereignty and the state, except for what it seemed, there is a story to achieve this demand and this goal and re -collect the Lebanese people with each other and dialogue and come out with results in the interest of the country and the interests of the Lebanese, there are major issues that still exist, including that the Israeli enemy did not stop the war and still attacks and prevents the displaced from returning To their country and is still threatening, so, is the national interest to complete this division and in this internal war? Here I am surprised that some are ready to make an internal war if it has the means, but in the face of Israel, this logic is not acceptable and we must support the position of His Excellency to achieve this goal, building the state, and we want to build the state, the lost state that created the field for the Israeli to occupy and assault, He produced this resistance, the resistance is not a substitute for the state, and the resistance is filled with the vacuum of the state, when the state can at least at this stage after the resistance required to withdraw weapons from southern Litani in implementation of the 1701 agreement is now required that the state can be able to impose on the Israeli enemy to withdraw from the occupied areas to stop the aggression, return the displaced and rebuild, and any other unacceptable logic, realism and logic, it says so, we must all be, we must all One class to demand the achievement of these matters, not to pressure the government, the President of the Republic, and the Lebanese army to face the resistance, and to take place a new civil war, which were the ones that were caused, in 1975 they produced a civil war, and this is what you are ready for, wars and internal temptations, but in defending the country and its borders did not accomplish anything, and we have not seen a project except the project of defeat, now you press the President You are calling for a new civil war, and this is unacceptable and will not be achieved. ”

Sheikh Al -Khatib concluded with the call, “to meet together, and to dialogue with the interest of Lebanon, what is the interest of Lebanon and how we protect Lebanon, while pushing towards the confrontation between the state and the resistance, this is illogical and immoral, and this is a disregard for the Lebanese people and the lives of the Lebanese people, this is a disregard for the values ​​of the Lebanese people and the homeland.”