What will Hezbollah disarm? Answer in a report

The report translated by “Lebanon 24” pointed out that the question is very major in Lebanon, knowing that the President of the Republic, Joseph Aoun, confirmed last week his desire to disarm Hezbollah this year, and it is understood that his favorite choice is to complete this process through a national dialogue.

The report notes that “this situation cannot be isolated from the broader transformations in the region,” and added: “The broader dialogue is now taking place between Iran and the United States, which puts the next steps for the Lebanese state in trouble. There is no doubt that the final decision regarding the disarmament of Hezbollah will be taken in Tehran, as it is a tool of terrorism in the hands of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard, and this was confirmed when the Iranian ambassador to Lebanon last week described the disarmament of the planned, from other criticisms, from other criticism Obvious to peoples. ”

He continued: “It is positive for the Iranian ambassador to be summoned against the background of his statements, because of its blatant interference in the affairs of the state. It is a good sign of the will of the Lebanese state in its pursuit of its sovereignty. This was not possible before only one year. In fact, Hezbollah turned into ruins due to the Israeli military campaign. With political change in Syria, Iran’s agent lost logistical support from Iran, which was essential to its operations. The sovereignty of the Lebanese state, but this does not mean that Hezbollah no longer has the ability and power to destroy Lebanon or target its opponents.

And he added: “If the regime in Tehran pushed Hezbollah to a confrontation, this would be one result of the defeat of Hezbollah and the humiliation of Tehran. Iran knows this, and Hezbollah knows this, and the publications of the Iranian ambassador on Ax confirming this weakness. Hezbollah’s disarmament should be an important point in dialogue with the United States on the Iranian nuclear file, as it is a similar tool.

The report stated that “regardless of any regional agreement, the will of the people is that it is the state that must monopolize weapons. With this, Aoun remains cautious in its approach, as it is well aware that Hezbollah is still a military force that may pose a threat to the future of Lebanon. Therefore, there must be popular support for this historical transformation.”

He continued: “Hezbollah’s disarmament may be a new starting point for Lebanon, a starting point for a real and sustainable reconstruction, a starting point for a Lebanese renaissance. It provides a historical opportunity that should not be missed. Therefore, the Lebanese need to crowd and push for this transformation, regardless of the results of the broader regional dialogues.”

The report stated that “the proposed solution for Hezbollah members is to join the Lebanese army, but not as an independent unit.” God also participates in any elections. Also, loyalty should be exclusive to Lebanon and the Lebanese Armed Forces.

He concluded: “Changing the way of Tehran’s dealing with Lebanon and its neighbors will be very important. Respecting the pledge not to intervene, abandoning any foreign military intervention, and only cooperation between countries, will be the best solution. This is what the American administration should seek in its dialogue. The end of the offensive activities of the Iranian regime is no less important than the nuclear issue, if not more, and this would be in line with the aspirations of the region The Lebanese people, and even once, combine regional goals and local goals.